I wanted to entitle this "The Love of Women", I've changed just because I am thinking that was more than a little misleading, and because I have a blog in mind that is specifically about the way women love. At the risk of making your eyes glaze over, I'll tell you up front that this blog is about politics.
There was a new study quoted in the New York times this morning that
pointed to the lack of insurance as being the number one predictor in
whether a cancer patient will live or die. So when deciding among the candidates for political office this year, I'm not going to vote
for someone who seems content to shoot for less than 100% coverage of every
American.
I think the battle will be uphill at best in the face of a
trillion dollar industry (medical insurers) who don't want to cover
anyone but those whom they must or whom they can charge the maximum
amount for the service. But it's a battle that over 47 million Americans are already fighting individually and we need someone to stand for us and join that battle. (that 47 million figure is about to get a lot higher since President Bush vetoed the Child Health Plan last fall ...)
When I hear people arguing against a universal health plan, I stop listening after the first few predictable sentences. .They talk about the perceived cost (rarely based on
actual numbers but on the scare numbers released by insurance
companies) or the feared consequences should they lose "choice" (again
based on scare tactics.) If you're insured, you don't have unlimited choice now in regard to the physician you see, which hospital you
can use, which drugs may be prescribed. You know
how the adults in Charlie Brown sound like "Wah Wah Wha?" When these
people start talking about the evils of a National Heath Care Plan, I
hear, "I don't get it, I don't get it, I don't get it."
One of the really unhappy aspects of the current political season is how quickly we condemn each other for "identity politics". So I want to say a few words about that. On the surface, it seems that saying, "I'm going to vote for Hillary because I'm a woman and she's a woman" would be a really lame method for choosing how to cast your vote. As would "I'm going to vote for/against Barack Obama because he's in/out of my group." or "I'm voting for/against John McCain because he's white/a veteran/old/republican/a man/Christian/non-Muslim ..."
But, having said that I think that there may be rational and very good reasons for voting according to "tribalism". There are aspects of American life which are almost universally experienced in different ways according to your tribal membership. Women tend to have a very different view of child care, health issues, family needs, and other issues than do men. Even the men with whom they share their lives and bodies.
Although women are human just as men are human, the experience of women shapes and informs their viewpoints differently than men's views are shaped and informed. In fact, I find it's so different that I can't begin to fathom why on EARTH men do/think/feel the way they do on a wide variety of issues that to me seem obvious and intuitive.
My friend, Maureen, way back in the early 90's before I saw it on tee shirts and bumper stickers used to say, "I need a wife." Maureen is beautiful, petite, funny and has never lacked for male companionship when she desired to have it. (In fact, she just got remarried and was a beautiful bride.) Her point then was that there are things that women need that they can only get from each other.
I love men. I have close friends who are men. I have two male friends and my brother with whom I can talk about almost any topic I can imagine. We'll call them ... Ben and Jerry and David. These guys are beyond smart, they are brilliant. They have keen insight on a wide variety of topics. They genuinely care about my life and my circumstances. And yet, there are some B, J, & D moments when I'm in the midst of telling them something or listening to their view and I realize that they are laboring to understand a concept that my sister Cheryl, or Cool Mary would have gotten without any explanation required.
This isn't about whether men or women are superior. I don't think it works that way. But there is a real difference between genders. Problems, obstacles, and experiences which may be invisible to the one are intuitive to the other. Solutions which seem obvious and work to the one make no sense to the other. (For example: If women had been in charge, I guarantee you we'd be on a 13 month lunar calendar.) And it is a valid thing to say, "I have concerns that I believe another woman/ black person/ Christian/ single-mom/ retired person/ Native American/ person who's dealt with the trauma of a sick child/ person who's nursed a dying parent - would understand intuitively and which must be explained to someone who hasn't been there."
I may yet change my mind, but it is my intention at this point to cast my vote for Hillary. (Not because she's a woman although I think that as a woman and a mother she "gets" many of my concerns on that intuitive level.) But because the number one issue for me is health care and her plan is the one that will cover the most Americans. I know it will be an uphill battle, and people who have health insurance will be making arguments about the evils of state mandates and the horrors of the way it is elsewhere. And my answer to any of those people is that until you have lived without insurance, without access to doctors or prescription medicines, until you have tried to figure out whether you could afford the cost of a mammogram or could go one more year without a pap smear, shut up.
There are a lot of areas in which middle and lower income American's are being squeezed. Compare your circumstances today with four years ago and consider whether today you have more or less access to affordable housing, child care, fuel, food (I wonder if any of the candidates know that milk has gone from about $2.75/gallon to over $4 a gallon in the past four years, or that eggs have gone from $1.29 a dozen to $2.19?), retirement, employment, higher education, and the list goes on and on.
You don't have to be one of the 47 million people without health insurance to know we have a problem in this country.
You don't have to be one of the 35 million Americans living in a food
insecure household to know we have a problem in this country.
You don't have to be one of the 1.6 million families who lost their homes last year to know that we have a problem in this country.
You don't have to be one of the 3.5 million homeless Americans to know we have a problem in this country.
You don't have to be one of the 5 million children in the home of an undocumented immigrant parent to know we have a problem.
You don't have to be one of the millions of Americans trying to work without a higher education to know that we have a problem.
You don't have to be one of the millions of Americans who paid 40-60% of their take home pay for child care to know we have a problem.
You don't have to be one of the above, but if you aren't you'd better at least recognize on some level that we have a problem and I hope you are looking for and voting for candidates who propose solutions to these problems which may or may not be your problem but which say a lot about the kind of country we live in.
Recent Comments