Month: November 2003

  • Happy Thanksgiving


    I'm packing up my little family today, we'll be traveling to visit grandparents for our Thanksgiving Holiday.  Usually at this time of year, we see all the decorations with the little Pilgrims and Indians sharing corn and squash.  Like many of our traditions, Thanksgiving is rooted in a history whose many details were not preserved and in a culture that we can barely understand as we look back on it.  From the comfort of our homes, and the security of knowing that the corner grocery has all we need, it's hard to imagine what it must have been like for those people huddled in Plymouth Plantation. 


    Several years ago, I picked up a paperback copy of William Bradford's journal, printed in a volume entitled "Of Plymouth Plantation, 1620-1647."  Except for five years in which he specifically requested that someone else be elected to the position, Bradford served as Governor of Plymouth for 36 years.  His journal records dates, events, people, and documents from those early years of European presence in America. 


    The Pilgrim experiment is a remarkable one.  They were blown off course, and found themselves outside the area covered by the charter they were granted by King James.  So before they left the ship, they drafted a document, the Mayflower Compact.  They had no idea the significance of their act, but it marked the first time in recorded history that free and equal men covenanted together to create their own civil government.  They based their government on the principles of equality and the free consent of the governed.


    The first year of the Pilgrim's experience in the New World, they battled starvation and sickness and lost 47 (about half) of their original number.  Thirteen out of eighteen wives died, only three families remained unbroken.  Bradford's wife, Dorothy was one of the first lost, but he barely mentions this pain in his journal.


    After descriptions of hope from a summer of planting and learning about the land they now inhabit, Bradford mentions the time of the first Thanksgiving, but not the date of the festival.  Indeed, his description is sparse. We have a few more details from a letter written by Edward Winslow and published in a volume entitled, "Mourt's Relation." 


    Our harvest being gotten in, our Governor sent four men on fowling that so we might after a more special manner rejoice together, after we had gathered the fruit of our labours.  They four in one day killed as much fowl as, with a little help beside, served the Company almost a week.  At which time, amongst other recreations, we exercised our arms, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and amongst the rest their greatest king, Massassoit with some 90 men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted.  And then they went out and killed five deer which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our Governor and upon the Captain and others.


    What Winslow didn't tell us, but Bradford did, is that the Pilgrims were in a difficult position after that first harvest.  They had enough food stores for each person to have a peck of meal per week.  That's approximately 2 gallon jugs or 7 metric litres.  They also had some dried turkeys and venison.  He had hopes that no one would starve.  But in the very next entry, he writes that a ship put in to the harbor and Cape Cod.   Thirty-five more people whom Bradford describes as lusty young men joined the colony, but brought no food, no supplies, barely more than the clothes on their backs.  The stores that the Pilgrims worked so hard to amass, were divided to provide for these newcomers. 


    In recent times, it has become popular to look back and scoff at these people for their religious views and for what we view as an unduly harsh attitude toward the nature of man and God.  But I wonder, if we were living in their shoes, might we have a different perspective. 


    I wish you all a Happy Thanksgiving.  I'll be back next week.


  • The Problem with Advice


    Last week when I was writing about codependent behavior, I mentioned advice-giving as a barrier to intimacy.  In the comments below that blog, I was asked to explain that statement.  I started a couple of replies but got sidetracked and well, it looks like that will be the topic for today because I've been thinking about it across the weekend. 


    Let me say up front, that all advice isn't bad.  I seek advice from people with more knowledge and experience than I have on any number of issues.  I like to hear other people's perspectives, and I feel that I learn a lot in terms of finding options that I might not have thought of on my own when I talk things over with other people.  Getting advice and opinions from other people helps me to sort through potential solutions and make a decision.  But there is a danger to advising.


    We all want to have good relationships and good communication in a variety of contexts.  Whether I'm speaking to a parent, child, spouse, friend, relative, boss, employee or colleague, I want to communicate effectively and in a way that has a positive impact on that relationship.  Experts have estimated that when a person has a problem to be solved or a need to be fulfilled, 90% of the time the response received from the person they talk with is a "high-risk" response.  These responses are high-risk because their impact on the communication and the relationship between the two people is frequently negative. 


    I like people.  I want to offer them anything I can to help them, including my advice.  Of course, I think that the solutions I offer to their problems are helpful or I wouldn't offer them.  Even though I'm aware of the traps of advice-giving, I do it far too often.  And what's wrong with advice?  Oftentimes, advice implies a lack of confidence in the ability of the person with the problem to understand and cope with his or her own difficulties.  It can be an insult to the intelligence of the other person.  In essence, we imply to the other person that they are making a big-deal out of something that is easily solved, why just look how quickly *I* could see the answer ...  The advice we are offering to be helpful, hurts the person receiving it by undermining their confidence, and contributing to low self-esteem, resistance, and defensiveness.


    The second major drawback to giving advice, is that the advisor is seldom in possession of all the facts.  When people share their concerns, they often only reveal the tip of the iceberg.  The advisor is unaware of the complexities, the feelings, the prior agreements and arrangements, previous arguments and discussions, the many other factors that have bearing on the situation.  Without this global knowledge, the advisor is unaware of all the implications of his or her advice. 


    But even if the advice is sound, there is a third reason to try avoiding becoming an advisor.  When I have a problem, and I want to talk it over with someone, I may be interested in finding a solution, but I'm rarely interested in the other person giving me a solution.  What I want from them is the assurance that I'm not alone in my feelings.  I want to know that I have connected with someone else who can share my concern without controlling my outcome.  In other words, I'm looking for intimacy.  Someone who hears my concern or problem and launches into "well, you should ... and then ... because ... " is pushing me back to arms length.  I understand this.  I've done it, too. 


    Getting up close and personal with another person's pain is an incredibly intimate thing, which is hard enough, but then there is still the fact that it's pain I'm getting close to.  I don't like that.  I'd just as soon pat your back, and say "there, there, it will be all right, let me tell you how to fix it ..." because feeling my own pain is difficult enough.  Feeling your pain, can be devastating.  I feel helpless, and frustrated in addition to the fact that I'm crying with you.  I want to fix it.  But I can't.  I have to trust you to fix it for yourself. 


    If I protect myself, and my feelings by holding you out at a distance and advising you, I may avoid some of that pain.  But I will also put a barrier in place that keeps us on a less intimate plane.  We both deserve better than that. 

  • Daughter of Grace (Part II)


    Some months ago I wrote a blog entitled, Daughter of Grace.  It's a title I blatantly lifted from a Twila Paris song that I've listened to a lot.  In that original blog I posted the lyric to the second verse of the song, here is the first part:


    She went down so low thought she'd never find the surface again
    Went so far astray thought she'd never find her way back home
    Hated to think about the past almost as much as she hated to think about the future
    She sat down inside to wait, to rest her mind awhile
    No use trying to fight with fate or fake a smile
    There she found the end of herself
    Heard a small voice crying for help
    and she was ...



    Carried in the arms of love and mercy
    Breathing in a second wind
    Shining with the light of each new morning
    Looking into hope again
    Unable to take another step
    Finally ready to begin
    Born for a second time in a brand new place
    Daughter of Grace


    If my weblog has a theme, I hope it's Grace.  I have spent my lifetime intrigued by Grace, hoping for Grace, trying to learn how to extend Grace, and never understanding it.  Like the moth to the flame I have circled around Grace and flown close enough to feel that it is a consuming fire ... but I've had a difficult time trusting myself to Grace. Part of the reason for this is my inherent nature, I was taught early and well to have no expectations of other people but to demand supreme effort from myself.  I learned that there was nothing I could count on unless I earned it and that even then the caprice of circumstances and other people's right to choose could deprive me without warning of the reward for which I've worked. 


    I choose Grace, I choose Mercy, I choose Love and all it means,
    I choose Grace, cause I need the power, and I need to walk in humility ....


    It's hard for me to choose Grace.  Soren Keirkegaard describes Faith as a leap in the dark.  I can understand that.  There comes a moment when you realize that you cannot know but you must decide anyway.  Leaping about in the dark carries certain risks.  I was merely strolling through the dark a few weeks ago and wound up with broken bones.  To choose Grace is not to leap in the dark, but to step into fire. 


    In recent months, I've been standing just outside the fire, drawn to it, unable to leave it, but not quite willing to step inside either.  A few hours ago, I let go of everything.  Releasing fear, doubt, and my need to know and control, I stepped into the fire of Grace.  I don't know where I'm going, I have no way of guessing the outcome of this move.  All I know for certain is that everything I have been is being burned down.  I have hope that I'll find myself refined like silver, melted and formed into something pure and useful.  But I have no guarantee of anything.  That's not all right with me, but it is necessary.   


    She spent half her life working hard to be
    someone you had to admire
    Met the expectations and added something of her own
    So proud of all that she had done
    (Where was the glory?)
    So proud of all that she had not done...
    'Til she knelt beneath a wall that will could never scale
    There she found the end of herself
    Heard her own voice crying for help
    And she was

    Carried in the arms of love and mercy
    Breathing in a second wind
    Shining with the light of each new morning
    Looking into hope again
    Unable to take another step
    Finally ready to begin
    Born for a second time in a brand new place
    Daughter of Grace


    We must all depend on grace
    Especially me.


    Yes, it amuses me that I would write a two part blog separated by months and months of other "stuff".  The link to the first post on this topic is in the custom module to the left. 

  • Codependent Thursday Stuff


    I've been reading today, all about Codependency.  I'm ready for someting easy to understand like Immanuel Kant's General Introduction to the Metaphysic of Morals.  Kant is easy, he's all about figuring out the relationships we have as persons who have both rights and duties to other people.  Come to think of it, that's the same thing that figuring out Codependence is all about. 


    So are you wondering what I'm talking about yet?  Hang in there it gets worse.  You all know I've been in therapy in recent weeks and I'm blatantly using my blog today to organize some of the thoughts I've been trying to sort through.  It's messy folks. 


    Some of the nicest people you'll ever meet are codependent.  They always smile and never refuse to do a favor.  They understand other people and have the ability to make other people feel good.  People like them.  There are two clues in these sentences to why this is a problem, the words 'always' and 'never.'  In healthy relationships, partners go out of their way for each other.  They engage in give and take.  In codependent relationships the taking and giving are one-sided. 


    Instead of merely approving of themselves, codependent people meet their need for self-esteem by earning the approval of others.  They give more than they take because giving allows them to feel useful and justifies their existence.  Codependent people have an underdeveloped sense of entitlement.  They have difficulty accepting from others because one must first feel deserving and entitled in order to freely accept what is offered. 


    It takes a lot of work to be codependent.  A codependent person frequently struggles with low self-esteem, depression, anxiety, and especially guilt as well as other painful thoughts and feelings.  They judge themselves using far stricter criteria for their own behavior than they use to measure the performance of others.  In fact, while they are brutally critical of their own misbehavior, they are very good at justifying and excusing the misbehavior of others.  "He didn't mean it."  "She didn't do it with malice."  "Its the best he can do."  "She had such a rotten childhood."  To their partners and friends they are understanding, patient, merciful, and kind.  With themselves they are nazi torture experts. 


    The central concept here is that the codependent person "takes it" and "understands" and "puts up with" and "forgives" despite feelings of hurt and anger which are rarely expressed or even acknowledged.  The codependent person waits for the build up of brownie points in heaven, or for a loved one to be magically healed through their persistent love and care-taking, they accept disrespect from others.  It does not occur to the codependent person that it is not ok to "take it" and "put up with" no matter what. 


    Codependent people frequently find themselves in abusive relationships because an unfortunate side effect of the codependent person's willingness to ignore, excuse, or otherwise allow abuse or disrespect is that the misbehavior directed at them continues and intensifies.  Implicit or explicit permission to misbehave is granted since the codependent person "understands."


    Control is the theme of the codependent life.  The codependent person controls self-esteem by catering to others.  He controls by being over-responsible taking up slack for others, she controls by advising others (which, by the way, is an excellent means of avoiding true intimacy.)  These people work very hard to control everyone and everything but they neglect the one person they truly have control over, themself.  (that looks funny - is themself a word?  isn't that paradoxical to put a plural with a singular?  I mean you wouldn't say "manyone" - some linguistic person might want to advise me on this one.)  Codependent people are also very good at clouding the subject with distraction and obfuscation.  


    Why would anyone do all this work, spend so much time and energy to control outcomes while actively neglecting the self?  How can they do this without realizing they are selling themselves short?  They don't know any other way, and they received very good training early in life.  Because I'm really talking about me today, I'll go ahead and skip through the various dysfunctional family scenarios that could produce a codependent person and zero in on the one that I know intimately.  When a parent is angry and controlling, the child learns to anticipate and please that parent in order to avoid humilation and punishment.  The child (me - this is all about me today - in spite of what I said about Kant) learns that love is conditional and that it must be earned. 


    You know I really am going to have to write a blog about Kant and his Higher Good.  It's so related to this whole problem of codependency and in fact, application of Kant's moral postulates may be my key to finding my way out of this mess.  See the first of Kant's postulates is that for the Higher Good, there must be freedom.  Free will, free choice, free french fries with your happy meal  Sorry, I couldn't resist .  Since codependency is about control, breaking that cycle has to be about release. 


    And completely unrelated to the above, I have a couple more pics of me and my friends to share ....


    Me and Natasha ....                                 Faith and Natasha


                                               

  • Note to Poets (and others who love words and writing)


    My friend, Dan, has launched a website, www.logolalia.com, that is a phenomenal poetic/writing/blogging/artistic experience.  I invite you all to drop in, kick around, and be amazed. 


    And Speaking of My Friends ...


    Last week, one of them posted a photo on her site that included my blurred image. . . Well, that's just not right.    So I'm posting my version of that photo here - with my face clearly visible.  From the weekend that we were all together here in Indiana ... I give you a formidable group of women in a coffee shop. 



     

  • I'm tired ...


    My NaNo novel this year is one I don't think I could ever publish - at least not if I want to be invited to the family reunion.  I'm calling it "The Year of Behaving Badly" and I'm drawing so much from my real life and the lives of my sisters that the lines between memoir and fiction are getting beyond blurred.  Its a book I have to write.  But, up until this week it's also been the book that I just can't write.  I've been eeking out thin sentences and paragraphs of less than 200 words in a day when the goal is to write 1,500.  Last night I had a dam burst.  I started writing and couldn't stop.  At 2:30 this morning, I finally quit because I couldn't stay awake any longer and the words were so misspelled that I didn't think I'd be able to decipher them this morning.  I wrote almost 5,000 words. 


    I still may not make the goal of completing 50,000 words in the month of November, because even last night's storm didn't catch me up.  But I'm writing again. 


    My friend Mary sent me a book last week, The Writer's Book of Hope, by Ralph Keyes.  In one of the early chapters, in fact on one of the first pages of the book, I found this portion of a sentence, "we should always be writing the story we can't."  There are a lot of reasons I can't write the story that I've been working on.  Too emotional, too private, too painful, and too uncertain ... but then again, those are all the same reasons that I have to write this story.  Whether I finish it in time to be certified a winner in the NaNoWriMo write-a-thon is beside the point.  I'm writing the story that I can't.  And that makes me a winner. 


  • Affirming Myself -


    My affirmation for the day reads: I defend and protect myself and those that I care for. 


    This is about well, almost exactly half true.  I have no problem defending or protecting someone I love.  I have in fact, been known to go too far in the defense and protection of a friend.  I'm not content to see a threat neutralized, I want it completely annihilated.  Except, I'm not very good at recognizing the threat to the happiness and well-being of my loved ones, when it comes out of that need I have to join the battle. 


    As a Mom, the hardest lesson that I have to keep learning over and over and over again, is that doing things for my kids that they are capable of doing for themselves - hurts them.  When they were learning to walk, of course I stayed close by, but I had to be willing to let them fall.  That was the first hard lesson of parenting and I'm still learning it.  I want to keep them close, keep them safe, and keep them happy.  But ultimately, they will be happiest, safest, and closest to me if I let them go - staying near enough to support them and help them bandage their wounds, but letting them try and fail and try again until they learn the thing they are working on. 


    If that's hard as a parent, it's excruciating as a friend.  At least with my children I have the memory of learning those necessary lessons and something of a conviction that they are necessary.  WIth my friends, I'm not so sure that all the pain they encounter is necessary. If I have the least inkling that I might be able to save them from pain, I want to jump in between them and whatever the threat may be.  My boys recognize this about me.  They say that I'm like "Belle" from Beauty and the Beast, that I'd be the one who would take the place of the old sick father to save him from the Beast.  (Plus, like Belle, I have my own library, but that's a blog of a different day.)


    Some of you no doubt have a label in mind for the kind of behavior I'm describing.  Yes, I'm an enabler, and I'm co-dependent.  I need to be needed.  Unless I think you need me, I'm not convinced of my value as a friend.  And in forty years, I haven't been able to successfully defeat this dragon that lives inside me.  The dragon roars and blusters and you know what, there are times when its good to have a dragon.  But, that same fire that burns away the enemy, can also scorch the earth closer to home. 


    Is this all a little bit vague?  I'm the kind of friend that you just can't get rid of.  I've adopted the snapping turtle approach to relationships, and for the most part it serves me well.  Once you are in my life and my heart, you can relax.  You'd pretty much have to attempt murder to get rid of me, and even then I'd probably assume that there were good reasons for that bullet whizzing past my head.  I'm not very good at setting boundaries, at being strong in a relationship.  I'm a soft touch.  I'll loan you money, I'll give you the key to my car, I'll be happy for you to help yourself to whatever you need - if I have it to give then I take literally the Spanish proverb mi casa su casa


    But you know something else, those kind of relationships, well, they aren't the kind of relationships that happen between adults.  I can't take care of everyone.  And I especially can't take care of anyone if I'm not taking care of me.  Quiltnmomi is ready to lay down her arms, and try dealing with people as though they are capable of taking care of themselves.  This is pretty scary folks.  I'm feeling a little vulnerable, like, what if people figure out they really don't need me?  How do you relate to people when they don't have to have you in their life?  I think I miss my armor already.



     

  • Dropping Down the Rabbit Hole


    One of the wonderful things for me about the Matrix series has been the way it's made it so much easier for me to drag my friends into conversations about the nature of reality, truth, ethics, knowledge, and power.  Power over mind, matter over mind, mind over mind - to what extent are any of these concepts real in your life, in my life?  See what you don't realize is that I have a secret deal with the Wachowski's - they start the conversation, and I'll keep 'em in cookies for life. 


    We're pushing up against 3,000 years since Plato wrote his allegory, The Cave.  In the cave, people are chained into a position where they can only see shadows on the wall from the light at the mouth of the cave.  When one escaped his chains and goes outside the cave for the first time humanity has access to the information that the shadow pictures they see are not the sum of reality.  There is a bigger reality, a reality Out There that they can experience, if they will only step outside into the sunlight.  The Matrix is in many ways no more than a retelling of Plato with special effects and a loud soundtrack. 


    But in the years since Plato, we have become increasingly more aware of the many ways in which our existence is or could be circumscribed.  We don't have to imagine ourselves in a cave to ask whether the information upon which we are basing our crucial decisions and actions is real information.  We've all thought it in the past year, how much can we trust the news media?  How much of a role does personal bias play in the reports we hear?  Or even, in what way are media sources manipulating both the medium and the public by slanting the news that is released?


    Des Cartes asked, what if there is a mailicious demon deceiving me about all my experiences, making me think that which is not true is the truth, or telling me that the truth is false?  Yes, it's a bizarre kind of question on the surface, but in fact, western thought has been so influenced by the resulting split between sensory and mental data in terms of what we view as authoritative and what we see skeptically, that we can't escape his duality in any area of our lives. 


    There's a Jackson Browne song from the 80's that I'm thinking of now.  Part of the lyric to that tune asks, "I wanna know who the men in the shadows are, I wanna hear somebody asking them why, they can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are, when they're never the ones to fight or to die, when there are lives in the balance ..."  And part of the reason that lyric is interesting to me, is that I doubt that any of us question whether there are men in the shadows.  We assume there are men in the shadows.  Even if we aren't conspiracy theorists, we still have a core understanding that we are not privileged to know the sources of the information, the people making political decisions that affect our lives.  To some extent, we already believe we are living in a Matrix. 


    The question we must ask ourselves is whether we are willing to take the red pill and see reality, or whether we will take the blue pill and avoid the questions altogether.  I took that red pill years ago and it's turned me into the kind of person that other people avoid at parties.  Because there is no flirting with these questions, once you start to ask them, they refuse to go away and you find yourself asking over and over and over again - am I here?  Or am I in the desert of the real?


    In Other News


    It's been almost 3 weeks since I broke my toe.  So I decided I've had long enough of a break from walking on my treadmill.  And one thing I can say about reality - is that a broken little toe has a way of getting attention even after the bruising is long gone. 

  • How do you open a Present?


    Tis the season to be making your list and checking it twice,
    making sure that your family is getting you something nice

    Has it started yet around your house?  The kids leaving "subtle" hints of the things they'd like for Christmas?  Your husband leaving the Craftsman Sale Flyer casually on your pillow?  Or maybe the wife has taped photos of that diamond necklace to the mirror?


    I freely admit that I'm a horrible participant in this game.  I don't make such a list.  My husband has learned a few rules over the years - such as "If it has a power cord - it's not romantic."  And, "If the day of the week ends in the letter "y," flowers are appropriate."  My kids are in a wonderful place right now.  My six year old and I share a love for bright and shiny sparkles.  His budget doesn't allow for the things that he REALLY likes, so he compromises.  I love the bracelet he gave me last year with big glass beads and silver charms.


    One of the things that I've become known for over the years, is my slowness opening gifts.  I savor the color of the print, and run my fingers across the bow.  I slide my nail beneath the tape and breath in the scent of the ink.  Then it's time to unfold that crease, and smile at the music of the crisp paper.  I have been known to take five minutes or more just unfolding the wrapping.  If the box inside is plain white, I have another moment of waiting of anticipating what may be inside.


    I remember one Christmas when I was in high school.  My just younger sister had found the perfect present for me.  It was a soft angora sweater that she loved.  In fact, she loved it so much that she bought it in a color that would look best on HER.  Then she told our other sister what she'd done.  Only, I heard.    SOOOOOOOO, on Christmas morning, when I opened that box, the biggest surprise was for my sister, that sweater had magically changed colors!  Yes, I did it.  I slipped under the tree and exchanged the present before Christmas.  She had chosen a rich green - I unwrapped a lovely lavender.   And I took a long time about unwrapping that box.  I knew what was inside of course, the fun that day was watching my sister watching me.  And seeing the expression on her face when she realized ... and seeing the expression on her face when I gave her the green sweater that she had originally bought. 


    My sister, Sam, is the quieter sister.  You here on Xanga have been much more familiar with my other sister, who used to write as fugitive but has largely abandoned her Xanga blog this Fall as she has returned to school.  Sam has a Xanga blog too, but her writing is more personal and mostly privatized.  Over the years my relationship with Sam has been difficult to unwrap.  When we were young, we had the misfortune to be close enough in age and interests for people to compare us.  We heard it often.  My sister is an accomplished pianist, we sang in the same choir, and we auditioned for the same parts in the Christmas program at church.  We were both sopranos back then.  I have since morphed into more of an alto.  (Which is fine by me because I love to sing harmony, I like the sound of it, the way it feels in my throat and the richness of the end result.) 


    Sam and I have lived near each other and far apart.  Right now, she is in Minnesota.  But although we are not close physically, we have grown closer over the past five years than we have ever been.  She's a really cool person having overcome serious challenges in her adult life in a way that I can only admire.  I'm the older sister, but I look up to her.  And you know what, if I could go back and do anything over - I wouldn't exchange that sweater. 

  • Ready Fire Aim


    Somedays, it just doesn't matter what you have planned, things get shuffled.